A big data approach to artificial intelligence driven predictive modelling for optimizing material properties in additive manufacturing – Scientific Reports

1. Joshua, R. J. N. et al. Powder bed fusion 3D printing in precision manufacturing for biomedical applications. Compr. Rev. Materials. 17 (3), 769 (2024).

   Google Scholar 

2. Zhou, L. et al. Additive manufacturing: A comprehensive review. Sensors 24 (9), 2668 (2024).

   Google Scholar 

3. Onuike, B. & Bandyopadhyay, A. Additive manufacturing of inconel 718–Ti6Al4V bimetallic structures. Additive Manuf. 22, 844–851 (2018).

   Google Scholar 

4. Ji, S. et al. Microstructural evolution and high-temperature resistance of functionally graded material Ti-6Al-4V/Inconel 718 coated by directed energy deposition-laser. J. Alloys Compd. 848, 156255 (2020).

   Google Scholar 

5. Park, C. W., Hajra, R. N., Kim, S. H., Lee, S. H. & Kim, J. H. Optimizing multi-interlayered additive manufacturing for high-strength robust joints in inconel 718 and Ti–6Al–4V alloys. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 25, 855–872 (2023).

   Google Scholar 

6. Hashemi, S. M. et al. Computational modeling of process–structure–property–performance relationships in metal additive manufacturing: a review. Int. Mater. Rev. 67 (1), 1–46 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

7. Sharma, A. S., Yadav, S., Biswas, K. & Basu, B. High-entropy alloys and metallic nanocomposites: processing challenges, microstructure development and property enhancement. Mater. Sci. Engineering: R: Rep. 131, 1–42 (2018).

   Google Scholar 

8. Kouraytem, N., Li, X., Tan, W., Kappes, B. & Spear, A. D. Modeling process–structure–property relationships in metal additive manufacturing: a review on physics-driven versus data-driven approaches. J. Physics: Mater. 4 (3), 032002 (2021).

   Google Scholar 

9. Yigezu, B. S., Mahapatra, M. M. & Jha, P. K. Influence of reinforcement type on microstructure, hardness, and tensile properties of an aluminum alloy metal matrix composite. J. Minerals Mater. Charact. Eng. 1 (4), 124–130 (2013).

10. Shahzad, K., Mardare, A. I. & Hassel, A. W. Accelerating materials discovery: combinatorial synthesis, high-throughput characterization, and computational advances. Sci. Technol. Adv. Materials: Methods. 4 (1), 2292486 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

11. Shen, S. C. et al. Computational design and manufacturing of sustainable materials through first principles and materiomics. Chem. Rev. 123 (5), 2242–2275 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

12. Herriott, C. & Spear, A. D. Predicting microstructure-dependent mechanical properties in additively manufactured metals with machine and deep-learning methods. Comput. Mater. Sci. 175, 109599 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

13. Lee, K. H., Lim, H. J. & Yun, G. J. A data-driven framework for designing microstructure of multifunctional composites with deep-learned diffusion-based generative models. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 129, 107590 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

14. Guo, S. et al. Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing: towards a physics-informed data-driven paradigm. J. Manuf. Syst. 62, 145–163 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

15. Nasiri, S. & Khosravani, M. R. Machine learning in predicting mechanical behavior of additively manufactured parts. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 14, 1137–1153 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

16. Min, Y. I. et al. Machine learning for predicting fatigue properties of additively manufactured materials. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 37 (4), 1–22 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

17. Valizadeh, M. & Wolff, S. J. Convolutional neural network applications in additive manufacturing: A review. Adv. Industrial Manuf. Eng. 4, 100072 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

18. Battula, S., Alla, S. N., Ramana, E. V., Kumar, N. K. & Murthy, S. B. Uncertainty quantification for digital twins in smart manufacturing and robotics: A review. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2837, No. 1, p. 012059). IOP Publishing. (2024), October.

19. Akbari, P., Zamani, M. & Mostafaei, A. Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing. Additive Manuf. 91, 104320 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

20. Pouchard, L., Reyes, K. G., Alexander, F. J. & Yoon, B. J. A rigorous uncertainty-aware quantification framework is essential for reproducible and replicable machine learning workflows. Digit. Discovery. 2 (5), 1251–1258 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

21. Sanyal, S. et al. Mt-cgcnn: integrating crystal graph convolutional neural network with multitask learning for material property prediction. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1811.05660. (2018).

22. Kong, S., Guevarra, D., Gomes, C. P. & Gregoire, J. M. Materials representation and transfer learning for multi-property prediction. Applied Phys. Reviews, 8(2). (2021).

23. Massa, D., Chmielna, I. N., Kaszuba, G., Papanikolaou, S. & Sankowski, P. Transfer Learning in Materials Informatics: structure-property relationships through minimal but highly informative multimodal input.

24. Xie, T. & Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (14), 145301 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

25. Karamad, M. et al. Orbital graph convolutional neural network for material property prediction. Phys. Rev. Mater. 4 (9), 093801 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

26. Shin, S. J. et al. Material-Adaptive anomaly detection using Property-Concatenated transfer learning in wire Arc additive manufacturing. Int. J. Precis Eng. Manuf. 25, 383–408 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

27. Yang, K. et al. Analyzing learned molecular representations for property prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59 (8), 3370–3388 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

28. Luo, Q., Shimanek, J. D., Simpson, T. W. & Beese, A. M. An image-based transfer learning approach for using in situ processing data to predict laser powder bed fusion additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V mechanical properties: 3D printing and additive manufacturing. 12(1), 48–60 (2024).

29. Li, L. et al. Uncertainty quantification in multivariable regression for material property prediction with bayesian neural networks. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 10543 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

30. Tang, W. et al. Modeling and prediction of fatigue properties of additively manufactured metals. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 36, 181–213 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

31. Battula, S., Alla, S. N., Ramana, E. V., Kumar, N. K. & Murthy, S. B. Uncertainty quantification for digital twins in smart manufacturing and robotics: A review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2837(1), 012059. (2024), October.

32. Toprak, C. B. & Dogruer, C. U. Optimal process parameter determination in selective laser melting via machine learning-guided sequential quadratic programing. Proc. Institution Mech. Eng. Part. C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 239 (3), 807–820 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

33. ASTM F2924-14. Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Titanium-6 Aluminium-4 Vanadium with Powder Bed Fusion (ASTM International, 2014).

34. ASTM B213-13. Standard Test Methods for Flow Rate of Metal Powders Using the Hall Flowmeter Funnel (ASTM International, 2013).

35. Dadbakhsh, S., Speirs, M., Kruth, J. P. & Van Humbeeck, J. Influence of SLM parameters on mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steel 316L. Rapid Prototyp. J. 22 (4), 654–664 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

36. ASTM E11-20. Standard Specification for Woven Wire Test Sieve Cloth and Test Sieves (ASTM International, 2020).

37. ASTM E8/E8M-21. Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials (ASTM International, 2021).

38. Vrancken, B., Thijs, L., Kruth, J. P. & Van Humbeeck, J. Heat treatment of Ti6Al4V produced by selective laser melting: microstructure and mechanical properties. J. Alloys Compd. 541, 177–185 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

39. ASTM E112-13. Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size (ASTM International, 2013).

40. Savitzky, A. & Golay, M. J. E. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal. Chem. 36 (8), 1627–1639 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

41. Li, R. et al. Application of unsupervised learning methods based on video data for real-time anomaly detection in wire Arc additive manufacturing. J. Manuf. Process. 143, 37–55 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

42. Zheng, Y. et al. A thermal history-based approach to predict mechanical properties of plasma Arc additively manufactured IN625 thin-wall. J. Manuf. Process. 140, 91–107 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

43. Zuo, X. et al. 3D printed All-Natural hydrogels: Flame-Retardant materials toward attaining green sustainability. Adv. Sci. 11 (3), 2306360 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

44. Wang, L. et al. Multi-unit global-local registration for 3D bent tube based on implicit structural feature compatibility. Adv. Eng. Inform. 65, 103120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2025.103120 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

45. Yao, S., Chen, F., Wang, Y., Zhou, H. & Liu, K. Manufacturing defect-induced multiscale weakening mechanisms in carbon fiber reinforced polymers captured by 3D CT-based machine learning and high-fidelity modeling. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manufac. 197, 109052 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

46. Zhang, Z. et al. Robotic wire-based friction stir additive manufacturing. Additive Manuf. 88, 104261 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

47. Niu, S. et al. Breaking the Trade-Off between complexity and absorbing performance in metamaterials through intelligent design. Small 21 (24), 2502828 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

48. Ren, D. et al. Harmonizing physical and deep learning modeling: A computationally efficient and interpretable approach for property prediction. Scripta Mater. 255, 116350 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

49. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: the materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1 (1), 011002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

50. Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. Materials design and discovery with High-Throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 65 (11), 1501–1509 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

51. Shen, C. et al. Physical metallurgy-guided machine learning and artificial intelligent design of ultrahigh-strength stainless steel. Acta Mater. 179, 201–214 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

52. Sun, X. et al. Wire-based friction stir additive manufacturing of AZ31B magnesium alloy: precipitate behavior and mechanical properties. J. Magnesium Alloys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2025.04.025 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

53. Chen, S., Khan, S. B., Li, N. & Xiao, C. In-depth analysis of sintering, exposure time, and layer height (µm) in LRS 3D printed devices with DLP. J. Manuf. Process. 133, 576–591 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

54. Ding, C., Li, C., Xiong, Z. & Li, Z. Computer-based big data technology in additive manufacturing and product design in sustainable manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 135 (9), 4855–4863 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

55. Long, J. et al. Printing dense and low-resistance copper microstructures via highly directional laser-induced forward transfer. Additive Manuf. 103, 104755 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

56. Xu, K. et al. Data-Driven materials research and development for functional coatings. Adv. Sci. 11 (42), 2405262 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

57. Shi, S. et al. Significance of α-Al cellular matrix in tensile behavior and work-hardening of additive manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy. Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 20(1), e2449189. (2025).

58. Zheng, Y. et al. A thermal history-based approach to predict mechanical properties of plasma Arc additively manufactured IN625 thin-wall. J. Manuf. Process. 140, 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.043 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

59. Wang, Z. et al. Digital-twin-enabled online wrinkling monitoring of metal tube bending manufacturing: A multi-fidelity approach using forward-convolution-GAN. Appl. Soft Comput. 171, 112684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112684 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

60. Sun, S. et al. Wire-based friction stir additive manufacturing enables enhanced interlayer bonding in aluminum-matrix composites. J. Manuf. Process. 153, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.08.078 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

61. Luo, J., Cheng, Z., Yu, N., Tian, Y. & Meng, J. A flexible skin material with switchable wettability for trans-medium vehicles. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 16 (2), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475411.2025.2504442 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

62. Sun, F. et al. A versatile microporous design toward toughened yet softened Self-Healing materials. Adv. Mater. 36 (50), 2410650. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202410650 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

63. Zhang, Z. et al. Robotic wire-based friction stir additive manufacturing. Additive Manuf. 88, 104261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.104261 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

64. Yang, G. et al. Prediction of restrained stress for UHPC: considering relationship between long-term and in-situ creep. Constr. Build. Mater. 484, 141722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141722 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

65. Zhang, J. et al. Modeling sediment flux in river confluences: A comprehensive momentum-based study. Water Resour. Res. 61, e2024WR039154. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039154 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

66. Ren, D. et al. Harmonizing physical and deep learning modeling: A computationally efficient and interpretable approach for property prediction. Scripta Mater. 255, 116350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2024.116350 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

67. Shen, C. et al. Physical metallurgy-guided machine learning and artificial intelligent design of ultrahigh-strength stainless steel. Acta Mater. 179, 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.033 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

68. Zhang, Z. et al. Optimization of low-power femtosecond laser Trepan drilling by machine learning and a high-throughput multi-objective genetic algorithm. Opt. Laser Technol. 148, 107688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107688 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

69. Wang, H., Li, Y., Men, T. & Li, L. Physically interpretable Wavelet-Guided networks with dynamic frequency decomposition for machine intelligence fault prediction. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybernetics: Syst. 54 (8), 4863–4875. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2024.3389068 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

70. Liu, H., Zhang, D. & Geng, D. Design of a self-excited vibration tool bar for cutting difficult-to-machine alloys. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 300, 110456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110456 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

71. Xu, H. et al. An innovative normal self-positioning method with gravity and friction compensation for wall-climbing drilling robot in aircraft assembly. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 138 (7), 3687–3704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15677-7 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

72. Cao, Y. et al. Structural-Functional-Integrated Ultra-Wideband Microwave-Absorbing composites based on in Situ-Grown graphene Meta-nanointerface. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34 (52), 2411271. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202411271 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

73. Peng, J. et al. Numerical simulation and process optimization of laser welding in 6056 aluminum alloy T-Joints. Crystals 15 (1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15010035 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

74. Cao, Y. et al. Multi-Functional Self-Sensing electronic gasket for structural health monitoring of transportation pipelines. Adv. Funct. Mater. 35 (20), 2412634. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202412634 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

75. Shi, S. et al. Significance of α-Al cellular matrix in tensile behavior and work-hardening of additive-manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 20 (1), e2449189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2024.2449189 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references