Skip to content
development-and-validation-of-a-multimodal-ai-agent-system-for-prognosis-analysis-of-bladder-urothelial-carcinoma-–-npj-precision-oncology

Development and validation of a multimodal AI-agent system for prognosis analysis of bladder urothelial carcinoma – npj Precision Oncology

Data availability

The WSIs, nephrographic CT scans, and annotation data used for both the training and validation sets are subject to institutional restrictions. Due to patient privacy obligations and Institutional Review Board (IRB) approvals, these data are not publicly available. However, they can be accessed upon reasonable request from the corresponding author, pending approval from the IRBs and legal departments of all participating centers.

Code availability

The source code is available online (https://github.com/hqh1997/MMS_AI_agent).

References

  1. Nadal, R., Valderrama, B. P. & Bellmunt, J. Progress in systemic therapy for advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 21, 8–27 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hemenway, G. et al. Advancements in Urothelial Cancer Care: Optimizing Treatment for Your Patient. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 44, e432054 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lopez-Beltran, A., Cookson, M. S., Guercio, B. J. & Cheng, L. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. BMJ 384, e076743 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Soualhi, A. et al. The incidence and prevalence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review. BMC Urol. 21, 110 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Compérat, E. et al. Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments. Lancet 400, 1712–1721 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shen, J., Li, Z., Wang, R., Ding, G. & Zhang, Y. Bladder cancer diagnostic and prognostic models from DNA methylation by multi algorithm machine learning. NPJ Precis. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-025-01195-y (2025).

  7. Raman, S. P. & Fishman, E. K. Bladder malignancies on CT: the underrated role of CT in diagnosis. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 203, 347–354 (2014).

  8. Compérat, E. et al. Updated pathology reporting standards for bladder cancer: biopsies, transurethral resections and radical cystectomies. World J. Urol. 40, 915–927 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Perez-Lopez, R., Ghaffari Laleh, N., Mahmood, F. & Kather, J. N. A guide to artificial intelligence for cancer researchers. Nat. Rev. Cancer https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-024-00694-7 (2024).

  10. McGenity, C. et al. Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. npj Dig. Med. 7, 114 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. He, J. et al. Development of a deep learning model for T1N0 gastric cancer diagnosis using 2.5D radiomic data in preoperative CT images. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 9, 249 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J. & Maier-Hein, K. H. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat. Methods 18, 203–211 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Lienkamp, S. S., Brox, T. & Ronneberger, O. in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2016 (eds Sebastien Ourselin et al) 424–432 (Springer International Publishing, 2016).

  14. Shao, Z. TransMIL: transformer based correlated multiple instance learning for whole slide image classification. In Proc. 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2136–2147 (ACM, 2021).

  15. Chen, R. J. et al. in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27–October 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part VIII 24. 339–349 (Springer, 2021).

  16. Saldanha, O. L. et al. Self-supervised attention-based deep learning for pan-cancer mutation prediction from histopathology. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 7, 35 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lu, M. Y. et al. A visual-language foundation model for computational pathology. Nat. Med. 30, 863–874 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, R. J. et al. Towards a general-purpose foundation model for computational pathology. Nat. Med. 30, 850–862 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yuan, Y. et al. Cell graph analysis in hepatocellular carcinoma: predicting local recurrence and identifying spatial relationship biomarkers. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 9, 261 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pisula, J. I. et al. Explainable, federated deep learning model predicts disease progression risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 9, 205 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lu, M. Y. et al. Data-efficient and weakly supervised computational pathology on whole-slide images. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 555–570 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, R. J. et al. Pan-cancer integrative histology-genomic analysis via multimodal deep learning. Cancer Cell 40, 865–878.e866 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, G. et al. DeepIGeoS: a deep interactive geodesic framework for medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 41, 1559–1572 (2018).

  24. Luo, X. et al. MIDeepSeg: minimally interactive segmentation of unseen objects from medical images using deep learning. Med. Image Anal. 72, 102102 (2021).

  25. Liang, J. et al. Deep learning supported discovery of biomarkers for clinical prognosis of liver cancer. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 408–420 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. He, Q. et al. Integrated multicenter deep learning system for prognostic prediction in bladder cancer. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 8, 233 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lee, Y., Ferber, D., Rood, J. E., Regev, A. & Kather, J. N. How AI agents will change cancer research and oncology. Nat. Cancer 5, 1765–1767 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ferber, D. et al. Development and validation of an autonomous artificial intelligence agent for clinical decision-making in oncology. Nat. Cancer https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-025-00991-6 (2025).

  29. Liu, X. et al. A generalist medical language model for disease diagnosis assistance. Nat. Med. 31, 932–942 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Selvaraju, R. R. et al. Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Int. J. Comput. Vision 128, 336–359 (2020).

  31. Suzuki, H. et al. Exploring drug resistance via intercellular crosstalk using spatial transcriptomics in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 9, 345 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li, T. et al. Computational pathology annotation enhances the resolution and interpretation of breast cancer spatial transcriptomics data. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 9, 310 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hatamizadeh, A. et al. in International MICCAI brainlesion workshop. 272–284 (Springer).

  34. Kirillov, A. et al. Segment anything. in Proc. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 4015–4026 (IEEE, 2023).

  35. Xie, S., Girshick, R., Dollár, P., Tu, Z. & He, K. Aggregated residual transformations for deep neural networks. in Proc. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 5987–5995 (IEEE, 2017).

  36. Ganesan, K. ROUGE 2.0: Updated and Improved Measures for Evaluation of Summarization Tasks. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01937 (2018).

  37. Zhang, T. et al. BERTScore: Evaluating text generation with BERT. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (2020).

  38. Chen, R. J. et al. in Proc. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 3995–4005 (IEEE, 2021).

  39. Chen, R. J. et al. Pathomic fusion: an integrated framework for fusing histopathology and genomic features for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 41, 757–770 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kokhlikyan, N. et al. Captum: a unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorch. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.07896 (2020).

  41. Zadeh, S. G. & Schmid, M. Bias in cross-entropy-based training of deep survival networks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 43, 3126–3137 (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support from the Medical Health Care Ecosystem Innovation Team of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CYYY-DSTDXM-202409), the Postgraduate Education Reform Project of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (jgxm-202501), and the Chongqing Municipal Education Commission’s 14th 5-year key discipline Support Project (No. 20240101). We thank all pathologists, radiologists, and related staff at the participating institutions for their assistance in data collection. Computing work was partly supported by the Supercomputing Center of Chongqing Medical University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Quanhao He, Hao Tan, Bangxin Xiao, Xiang Peng, Canjie Peng, Weiyang He & Mingzhao Xiao

  2. Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Yiwen Tan

  3. Department of Pathology, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    YingJia Liu

  4. Department of Pathology, College of Basic Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Youde Cao

  5. Department of Clinical Pathololgy Laboratory of Pathology Diagnostic Center, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Youde Cao

  6. Molecular Medicine Diagnostic and Testing Center, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Youde Cao

  7. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Fa Jin Lv

  8. College of Artificial Intelligence Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Wenlong Zhao

  9. College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Wenlong Zhao

  10. Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Xiaofeng Yue

Authors

  1. Quanhao He
  2. Hao Tan
  3. Bangxin Xiao
  4. Xiang Peng
  5. Canjie Peng
  6. Yiwen Tan
  7. YingJia Liu
  8. Youde Cao
  9. Fa Jin Lv
  10. Wenlong Zhao
  11. Xiaofeng Yue
  12. Weiyang He
  13. Mingzhao Xiao

Contributions

Q.H.H., H.T., B.X.X., Y.W.T., X.P., W.Y.H., and M.Z.X. conceived and designed the study; H.T., C.J.P., X.F.Y., X.P., and X.Z. collected the data. Q.H.H., H.T., and C.J.P. evaluated images. Y.J.L., Y.W.T., and D.Y.C. labeled the pathological slide images. F.J.L. supervised and annotated the radiographic images. Q.H.H., W.L.Z., and X.P. trained and developed the AI system. Q.H.H., B.X.X., and Y.W.T. analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. Q.H.H. and X.F.Y. were responsible for revising the manuscript and performing supplementary experiments. W.L.Z., X.F.Y., W.Y.H., and M.Z.X. supervised and directed the study.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenlong Zhao, Xiaofeng Yue, Weiyang He or Mingzhao Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, Q., Tan, H., Xiao, B. et al. Development and validation of a multimodal AI-agent system for prognosis analysis of bladder urothelial carcinoma. npj Precis. Onc. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01415-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01415-z

colind88

Back To Top